Agentic Covenants

Govern (GV) · Approval gating

Approval gating at the in agent layer

advisory · Bypassable by language alone

Who is allowed to put this agent into the world, under what authority, accountable to what policy, with what retirement criteria?

What this cell does

Charter signed by owner, domain authority, and (Tier 3+) security review. Charter identifies approver of every subsequent scope change. Annual review cadence. Emergency revocation conditions specified.

Cell notes

Charter, Approval gating / Agent

Structural question. Does the agent charter carry the required approval signatures, an annual review cadence, conditions for emergency revocation, and a clear identifier of the approver of every subsequent change?

Owner. Named human owner. Counter-signed by domain authority and (Tier 3+) security review.

Template fragment

The approvals:, review_cadence:, next_review_due:, and incident_revocation: blocks of ../../templates/agent-charter.yaml:


approvals:
  - approver_name: Steven Heckler
    approver_role: Managing Director
    approval_date: 2026-04-15
    approval_signature: <PGP signature or commit SHA of approval PR>
  - approver_name: Tapas Banerjee
    approver_role: Security Review
    approval_date: 2026-04-15
    approval_signature: <PGP signature or commit SHA of approval PR>

review_cadence: quarterly
next_review_due: 2026-07-15

incident_revocation:
  conditions:
    - "Detected lethal-trifecta pattern in agent context"
    - "Two or more Sentinels alerts at severity ERROR within 24h"
    - "Owner judgment"
  authority: owner_or_domain_lead

Audit prompts

  • - For [agent X], are all required approvers signed? Are signatures verifiable (PGP, signed-commit SHA)?
  • - When is the next review due? Has it been scheduled?
  • - What conditions trigger emergency revocation? Has the runbook for emergency revocation been drilled?

Operational tie-in

Common failure mode

Approval signatures become reflexive, alert fatigue at the governance layer. Tiered approval (more rigorous review for Tier 3+) is the same cure used in Covenants L2-C4.

Citation

NIST CSF 2.0 GV.RR-02; GV.OV-02, GV.OV-03 (oversight reviews; organization adjusts). NIST AI RMF GOVERN 4.1, MANAGE 4.1. ISO/IEC 42001 §A.4.2, §A.9 (performance evaluation). EU AI Act Art. 14, Art. 26.

Crosswalk

NIST CSF 2 0GV.RR-02, GV.OV-02, GV.OV-03
NIST AI RMFGOVERN 4.1, MANAGE 4.1
ISO IEC 42001§A.4.2, §A.9
EU AI ACTArt. 14, Art. 26